Across flowering plants, many lineages have transitioned from radially symmetric flowers (with multiple planes of symmetry) to bilaterally symmetric flowers (with a single plane of symmetry). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this trend, including the “pollen placement hypothesis”. This hypothesis reasons that a reduction in the number of planes of floral symmetry should result in more precise placement of pollen (and stigmas) onto pollinators as a result of more consistent pollinator entry into flowers. The resulting improvement in pollen-transfer efficiency should increase the plant’s potential reproductive output per unit floral reward produced.
06 January, 2016
Floral symmetry affects bumblebee approach consistency in artificial flowers
Across flowering plants, many lineages have transitioned from radially symmetric flowers (with multiple planes of symmetry) to bilaterally symmetric flowers (with a single plane of symmetry). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this trend, including the “pollen placement hypothesis”. This hypothesis reasons that a reduction in the number of planes of floral symmetry should result in more precise placement of pollen (and stigmas) onto pollinators as a result of more consistent pollinator entry into flowers. The resulting improvement in pollen-transfer efficiency should increase the plant’s potential reproductive output per unit floral reward produced.
12 November, 2015
Thesis, deconstruction and new synthesis: the changing face of applied pollination
By Peter Kevan
![]() |
|
Beetle (Chauliognathus pensylvanicus) on
Rudbeckia (Black-eyed Susan) |
Since
the first 18th Century scientific accounts of how pollination works
it has risen in respectability in botany, zoology, evolution and ecology. Pollination biology provided huge
opportunities for focussed research in basic and applied sciences so that
disciplinary solitudes arose. Botany and
zoology tended to be separate within biology as well as in agronomy and
apiculture. Over the history of
pollination biology, which can be placed into six inter-related facets, philosophical,
social, scientific, technical, political and business agendas have hampered,
and continue to hamper, objective science.
Nevertheless, modern interdisciplinary approaches to pollination
ecology, its inherent co-evolutionary principles, and the current “pollination”
crisis have become a scientific and social unifying force that cannot but lead
to new knowledge, insights and, I hope, wisdom (new synthesis).
Read the scientific publication in JPE.
10 November, 2015
Pollination syndromes - A response to Aguilar et al.’s (2015) critique of Ollerton et al. (2009)
by Waser, Ollerton and Price
![]() |
| Bumble bee and butterfly in Tenerife |
Pollination syndromes continue to attract much discussion and debate in the scientific literature, and in their reply to Ollerton et al.'s (2015) Journal of Pollination Ecology critique, Aguilar et al. (2015) take issue with both the critique and an earlier paper (Ollerton et al. 2009). In our response to their reply we point out that what Aguilar et al. (2015) seem to see as fatal flaws in the earlier study (Ollerton et al. 2009) are in fact no such thing, and stem from a misunderstanding of that paper. No doubt the discussion of pollination syndromes will continue for some time to come.
Read the scientific publication in JPE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


